Gypsy was the most believable one. |
As a host/riffer, Joel had a very sarcastic, dry quality to his jokes. Watching him struggle through certain movies, one gets the sense that he very nearly succumbed to Forrester's evil plan, but Servo and Crow's wisecracks continually brought him back.
Mike Nelson is a different flavor of ice cream altogether. Long the head writer on the show, Mike stepped in when Joel left, with the story being that the Mads needed a new dope to torture in Robinson's absence. Mike quickly acclimates to the Satellite of Love and its strange mechanical inhabitants, countering Forrester's cinematic stink bombs with his own quips.
Nelson held the host position for a longer stretch of time than Joel, and so many fans grew up watching him. Beyond the nostalgia factor though is the fact that Mike has a more agreeable sense of humor. Most of his riffs can be appreciated without specific knowledge of the references contained, and he seemed to have more enthusiasm for life. Keep in mind that this is not a judgment call on Joel Hodgson, just Joel Robinson. And let's be fair, after almost having my mind turn to mush thanks to years of watching crappy movies, I'd be sarcastic and cynical too.
Hodgson gave us the gift of MST3K in the first place, and that cannot be underestimated. But this is not a site where I wuss out and say "both hosts have something to offer the viewer" true as that may be. This is a site with an opinion, and in my humble opinion, Mike is the better host. Agree? Disagree? Want to tear my head off and send it to Crow's evil twin Timmy? Let me hear it!
Nelson held the host position for a longer stretch of time than Joel, and so many fans grew up watching him. Beyond the nostalgia factor though is the fact that Mike has a more agreeable sense of humor. Most of his riffs can be appreciated without specific knowledge of the references contained, and he seemed to have more enthusiasm for life. Keep in mind that this is not a judgment call on Joel Hodgson, just Joel Robinson. And let's be fair, after almost having my mind turn to mush thanks to years of watching crappy movies, I'd be sarcastic and cynical too.
Hodgson gave us the gift of MST3K in the first place, and that cannot be underestimated. But this is not a site where I wuss out and say "both hosts have something to offer the viewer" true as that may be. This is a site with an opinion, and in my humble opinion, Mike is the better host. Agree? Disagree? Want to tear my head off and send it to Crow's evil twin Timmy? Let me hear it!
I've got to agree with your assessment. I've seen both Joel and Mike's performances, and I found Mike to be a much more lively, engaging personality. Joel's drab deadpan style might have entertained others, but it put me off.
ReplyDeleteLet's not get into the whole kirk/pichard thing guys
ReplyDeleteI love both hosts and both have made me laugh hard enough to hurt.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I always liked Joel better. He interacted with the 'bots in a more affectionate way and the dryness of his humor was personally more appealing.
Both guys are amazing though. Mike gets props for taking over from a beloved host and running with it in a way that did not alienate long time fans and drew new fans to the show.
So peace out, they are both fantastic!!